Bite Down
Common · Instant
5.8PlayableRank 113 of 271
55.8%Rank 105 of 274 by win rate, card in hand · set average: 55.7%
How are these measures computed?
Pick rating. The pick rating estimates what a card is worth when you choose it, before there are results: it combines several signals (expert evaluations, the choices of strong players, characteristics of the card such as its cost and rarity) and was tuned on the results of decks of strong players. It is for comparing cards while you draft.
Observed strength. The observed strength is the win rate of the games in which the card was in hand at some point (opening hand or drawn), from hundreds of thousands of real games of online draft players since the set came out. The rank compares the cards seen in at least 1,000 games. It does not correct for the strength of the deck the card is played in, and a result stays uncertain for a card that is played little (about 1.6 points of margin at 1,000 games).
Good playable that always makes the cut (5.8/10).
Why. A two-mana instant removal: your creature deals damage equal to its power to an opposing creature or planeswalker, and takes none back. With a big creature, it is a great trade.
Risks. You need a creature of your own, and the opponent can respond by killing it. Without enough power, it kills nothing.
In the draft. A good green removal, worth taking fairly high. It is better with big creatures in your deck, so look for them alongside.
Win rate of the card
Percentage of games won by the decks that play this card, depending on when it shows up, from the real games of the set.
Gap when it is drawn, against the games where it is not : +1.5 win-rate points
Its place in the set
- Common: rank 15 of 90
- Green: rank 17 of 43
- Cost 2: rank 24 of 57
- Average pick: 5.4 (1 = taken first from a pack; the lower the number, the earlier players choose it)
Win rate by colour pair
Percentage of games won by the decks of each pair that play the card, with the number of games. The pairs are the two main colors of the deck: when the card has a color outside the pair, the deck plays it as a splash (marked “splash”). A pair that has an archetype in this set leads to its guide.
Win rate: strong players and all players
Percentage of games won when the card is in hand; strong players are those ranked diamond or mythic online.
Win rate on the play and on the draw
Win rate by number of copies in the deck
- 1 copy53.9 % · 88,372 games
- 2 copies55.1 % · 34,661 games
- 3 copies55.2 % · 6,502 games
- 4 copies or more57.0 % · 665 games
Win rate since the set came out (card in hand)
- First two weeks54.8 % · 39,841 games
- Next two weeks56.9 % · 19,855 games
- After that56.9 % · 3,275 games
Win rate alongside other cards
Win rate of the decks that play both cards, compared with the one you would expect from what each card gets alone. At least 150 games together.
Cards it wins more with
- Painful Quandary457 games · 50.8 % (instead of 47.1% expected)
- Sower of Chaos6,834 games · 57.1 % (instead of 54.7% expected)
- Goblin Boarders12,899 games · 56.4 % (instead of 54.1% expected)
Cards it wins less with
- Zul Ashur, Lich Lord1,519 games · 48.3 % (instead of 53.3% expected)
- Alesha, Who Laughs at Fate2,391 games · 51.4 % (instead of 55.7% expected)
Where it is played
G/R · 67 %G/U · 67 %
Played in 17% of the decks of the set
Other cards of the same cost and colours
3. Scavenging Ooze
9.1
39. Anthem of Champions
7.2
55. Ruby, Daring Tracker
6.8
60. Nessian Hornbeetle
6.6
Intrinsic ratings: they do not take into account the cards you have already picked. They matter most for the first pick of the first pack.