Heroic Feast
Rare · Enchantment
6.2GoodRank 90 of 276
52.8%Rank 207 of 273 by win rate, card in hand · set average: 56.8%
How are these measures computed?
Pick rating. The pick rating estimates what a card is worth when you choose it, before there are results: it combines several signals (expert evaluations, the choices of strong players, characteristics of the card such as its cost and rarity) and was tuned on the results of decks of strong players. It is for comparing cards while you draft.
Observed strength. The observed strength is the win rate of the games in which the card was in hand at some point (opening hand or drawn), from hundreds of thousands of real games of online draft players since the set came out. The rank compares the cards seen in at least 1,000 games. It does not correct for the strength of the deck the card is played in, and a result stays uncertain for a card that is played little (about 1.6 points of margin at 1,000 games).
It wins less than its rating suggests.
Why this gap?
The pick rating is a prior: it is for choosing a card before there are results. The observed strength comes from real games, and the win rate of a card is stable from one week to the next. The gap often comes from a card that is easy to replace at the pick but very efficient once played, from a good archetype that carries it, or from a flaw of our rating: in a set that already has many games, the results are more reliable than the rating.
Good playable that always makes the cut (6.2/10).
Why. A three-mana enchantment that creates a Food token, and whenever you gain life it puts a +1/+1 counter on up to that many creatures. With several lifegain sources it can grow your whole team.
Risks. It does nothing to the board by itself, and the Food gives only one life gain. Without other lifegain sources it stays weak.
In the draft. Avoid unless you are in a green deck built around lifegain. Take it after good creatures.
Win rate of the card
Percentage of games won by the decks that play this card, depending on when it shows up, from the real games of the set.
Gap when it is drawn, against the games where it is not : +0.6 win-rate points
Its place in the set
- Rare: rank 39 of 60
- Green: rank 10 of 37
- Cost 3: rank 32 of 80
- Average pick: 5.6 (1 = taken first from a pack; the lower the number, the earlier players choose it)
Win rate by colour pair
Percentage of games won by the decks of each pair that play the card, with the number of games. The pairs are the two main colors of the deck: when the card has a color outside the pair, the deck plays it as a splash (marked “splash”). A pair that has an archetype in this set leads to its guide.
Win rate: strong players and all players
Percentage of games won when the card is in hand; strong players are those ranked diamond or mythic online.
Win rate on the play and on the draw
Win rate by number of copies in the deck
- 1 copy53.1 % · 5,973 games
- 2 copies50.1 % · 405 games
Win rate since the set came out (card in hand)
- First two weeks53.9 % · 1,777 games
- Next two weeks51.7 % · 917 games
- After that50.5 % · 109 games
Win rate alongside other cards
Win rate of the decks that play both cards, compared with the one you would expect from what each card gets alone. At least 150 games together.
Cards it wins more with
- The Astonishing Ant-Man409 games · 56.7 % (instead of 52.1% expected)
- Frozen in Ice592 games · 57.9 % (instead of 53.6% expected)
- Abomination, Terrifying Titan1,037 games · 56.6 % (instead of 52.5% expected)
- Villainous Hideout352 games · 56.3 % (instead of 52.4% expected)
Cards it wins less with
- Bold Biochemist448 games · 48.0 % (instead of 54.1% expected)
- Justice, Vance Astrovik344 games · 50.9 % (instead of 56.0% expected)
- Futurist Forge367 games · 49.0 % (instead of 53.8% expected)
Other cards of the same cost and colours
Intrinsic ratings: they do not take into account the cards you have already picked. They matter most for the first pick of the first pack.




