Elementalist Adept
Common · Creature — Human Wizard
4.2WeakRank 225 of 271
52.7%Rank 195 of 274 by win rate, card in hand · set average: 55.7%
How are these measures computed?
Pick rating. The pick rating estimates what a card is worth when you choose it, before there are results: it combines several signals (expert evaluations, the choices of strong players, characteristics of the card such as its cost and rarity) and was tuned on the results of decks of strong players. It is for comparing cards while you draft.
Observed strength. The observed strength is the win rate of the games in which the card was in hand at some point (opening hand or drawn), from hundreds of thousands of real games of online draft players since the set came out. The rank compares the cards seen in at least 1,000 games. It does not correct for the strength of the deck the card is played in, and a result stays uncertain for a card that is played little (about 1.6 points of margin at 1,000 games).
A good playable, but is sometimes cut (4.2/10).
Why. A two-mana 2/1 with flash and prowess. You can play it at the end of the opponent's turn, then it gets +1/+1 until end of turn when you cast a noncreature spell. It suits decks with plenty of instants and sorceries.
Risks. With one toughness it dies to nearly anything. Without enough noncreature spells it is just a small 2/1, and it has little impact on its own.
In the draft. A blue filler for a deck with a number of noncreature spells. Outside that plan it is weak, so do not take it early.
Win rate of the card
Percentage of games won by the decks that play this card, depending on when it shows up, from the real games of the set.
Gap when it is drawn, against the games where it is not : +0.3 win-rate points
Its place in the set
- Common: rank 68 of 90
- Blue: rank 36 of 44
- Cost 2: rank 48 of 57
- Average pick: 9.3 (1 = taken first from a pack; the lower the number, the earlier players choose it)
Win rate by colour pair
Percentage of games won by the decks of each pair that play the card, with the number of games. The pairs are the two main colors of the deck: when the card has a color outside the pair, the deck plays it as a splash (marked “splash”). A pair that has an archetype in this set leads to its guide.
Win rate: strong players and all players
Percentage of games won when the card is in hand; strong players are those ranked diamond or mythic online.
Win rate on the play and on the draw
Win rate by number of copies in the deck
- 1 copy52.8 % · 63,963 games
- 2 copies51.6 % · 19,185 games
- 3 copies52.4 % · 3,158 games
- 4 copies or more48.0 % · 423 games
Win rate since the set came out (card in hand)
- First two weeks52.4 % · 28,734 games
- Next two weeks53.0 % · 13,476 games
- After that51.8 % · 1,999 games
Win rate alongside other cards
Win rate of the decks that play both cards, compared with the one you would expect from what each card gets alone. At least 150 games together.
Cards it wins more with
- Niv-Mizzet, Visionary2,106 games · 48.3 % (instead of 45.5% expected)
- Chandra, Flameshaper2,014 games · 56.6 % (instead of 54.2% expected)
- Bloodthirsty Conqueror1,421 games · 56.0 % (instead of 53.9% expected)
- Gleaming Barrier3,317 games · 49.3 % (instead of 47.0% expected)
Cards it wins less with
- Adventuring Gear346 games · 41.9 % (instead of 46.9% expected)
- Painful Quandary295 games · 42.0 % (instead of 45.3% expected)
Where it is played
R/U · 46 %U/W · 38 %
Played in 11% of the decks of the set
Other cards of the same cost and colours
27. Mischievous Mystic
7.5
37. Drake Hatcher
7.2
40. Essence Scatter
7.1
96. Balmor, Battlemage Captain
6.2
Intrinsic ratings: they do not take into account the cards you have already picked. They matter most for the first pick of the first pack.